5 Aug
2019
5 Aug
'19
7:12 p.m.
Please tag backported PRs if they need to be in next point release
v14.2.3 (label:nautilus-batch-1 label:needs-qa).
Current plan is to start QE validation in the middle of August and
finish the release by the end of this month.
Thx
YuriW
14 Aug
14 Aug
10:54 p.m.
We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and will lock the repo.
Alfredo mentioned that we have a bunch of ceph-volume PRs pending.
Pls merge them ASAP. Let me know if you need help testing them.
Thx
YuriW
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:12 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Please tag backported PRs if they need to be in next point release
> v14.2.3 (label:nautilus-batch-1 label:needs-qa).
>
> Current plan is to start QE validation in the middle of August and
> finish the release by the end of this month.
>
> Thx
> YuriW
21 Aug
21 Aug
8:25 p.m.
New subject: Nautilus v14.2.3 - RGW regression?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and will
lock the repo.
I see the repo has been locked. Today I found a possible RGW regression
(bringing Matt and Casey into CC).
The regression appears to have been introduced when
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29410 was merged into nautilus.
There was a plan to backport the commits from
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29560 into that PR, but that never happened.
I just opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29801 to fix the regression.
Do I understand correctly that this PR needs to go into v14.2.3?
Nathan
8:39 p.m.
New subject: Nautilus v14.2.3 - RGW regression?
Thanks for catching this Nathan. The regression is a deadlock in
rgw-nfs, so I would really like to include the fix for 14.2.3. We don't
have any coverage of this feature in teuthology, so the fix can be
merged without waiting for additional qa.
Casey
On 8/21/19 1:25 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>> We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and will lock the repo.
> I see the repo has been locked. Today I found a possible RGW regression
> (bringing Matt and Casey into CC).
>
> The regression appears to have been introduced when
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29410 was merged into nautilus.
> There was a plan to backport the commits from
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29560 into that PR, but that never happened.
>
> I just opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29801 to fix the regression.
> Do I understand correctly that this PR needs to go into v14.2.3?
>
> Nathan
8:56 p.m.
New subject: Nautilus v14.2.3 - RGW regression?
Thanks, yes.
Matt
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:25 PM Nathan Cutler <ncutler(a)suse.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
--
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
tel. 734-821-5101
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and
will lock the repo.
I see the repo has been locked. Today I found a possible RGW regression
(bringing Matt and Casey into CC).
The regression appears to have been introduced when
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29410 was merged into nautilus.
There was a plan to backport the commits from
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29560 into that PR, but that never happened.
I just opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29801 to fix the regression.
Do I understand correctly that this PR needs to go into v14.2.3?
Nathan
10:14 p.m.
New subject: Nautilus v14.2.3 - RGW regression?
merged and waiting for rebuild
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:39 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for catching this Nathan. The regression is a deadlock in
> rgw-nfs, so I would really like to include the fix for 14.2.3. We don't
> have any coverage of this feature in teuthology, so the fix can be
> merged without waiting for additional qa.
>
> Casey
>
> On 8/21/19 1:25 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> >> We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and will lock the repo.
> > I see the repo has been locked. Today I found a possible RGW regression
> > (bringing Matt and Casey into CC).
> >
> > The regression appears to have been introduced when
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29410 was merged into nautilus.
> > There was a plan to backport the commits from
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29560 into that PR, but that never happened.
> >
> > I just opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29801 to fix the regression.
> > Do I understand correctly that this PR needs to go into v14.2.3?
> >
> > Nathan
10:54 p.m.
New subject: Nautilus v14.2.3 - RGW regression?
thanks, yuri
Matt
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:14 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
merged and waiting for rebuild
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:39 AM Casey Bodley <cbodley(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for catching this Nathan. The regression is a deadlock in
> rgw-nfs, so I would really like to include the fix for 14.2.3. We don't
> have any coverage of this feature in teuthology, so the fix can be
> merged without waiting for additional qa.
>
> Casey
>
> On 8/21/19 1:25 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> >> We are planning to start QE on 14.2.3 soon and will lock the repo.
> > I see the repo has been locked. Today I found a possible RGW regression
> > (bringing Matt and Casey into CC).
> >
> > The regression appears to have been introduced when
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29410 was merged into nautilus.
> > There was a plan to backport the commits from
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29560 into that PR, but that never happened.
> >
> > I just opened https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/29801 to fix the regression.
> > Do I understand correctly that this PR needs to go into v14.2.3?
> >
> > Nathan
--
Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage
tel. 734-821-5101
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
1733
days inactive
1749
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Casey Bodley -
Matt Benjamin -
Nathan Cutler -
Yuri Weinstein