Documentation Refactor - Kubernetes Helm Procedure Wrong (Bug #2)
I am updating the Ceph documentation. Included in this email is a proposed change to the documentation and a request for information pertaining to that proposed change. If you know about the issue behind the proposed change and you have information pertinent to it that you would like to enshrine in the documentation, reply to this email and tell me. Documentation Link: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/kube-helm/ Proposed Change: Removing the Helm-related material from the documentation entirely. Zac's Request: Can anyone provide a compelling reason for keeping the Helm documentation? Tracking Information (this can be ignored by everyone but Zac) Bug # 2 here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/Report_Documentation_Bugs
Hi Zac, Am 04.12.19 um 00:04 schrieb John Zachary Dover:
I am updating the Ceph documentation. Included in this email is a proposed change to the documentation and a request for information pertaining to that proposed change. If you know about the issue behind the proposed change and you have information pertinent to it that you would like to enshrine in the documentation, reply to this email and tell me.
Documentation Link: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/kube-helm/
Proposed Change: Removing the Helm-related material from the documentation entirely.
Zac's Request: Can anyone provide a compelling reason for keeping the Helm documentation?
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-helm is unmaintained since two years already. Which means I really except this to fail to properly deploy an octopus cluster. Why keep an installation documentation that is going to fail? Everyone is using Rook nowadays. As we still have the old documentations online ( https://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/ ), so users can still have a look, despite it being removed from octopus. Best, Sebastian
Tracking Information (this can be ignored by everyone but Zac) Bug # 2 here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/Report_Documentation_Bugs
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
-- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Sebastian, I figured that kube-helm's documentation can be removed, but I wanted to make sure with the community before I did it. Here's the PR that removes the kube-helm docs: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/32009 On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:13 PM Sebastian Wagner <swagner@suse.com> wrote:
Hi Zac,
Am 04.12.19 um 00:04 schrieb John Zachary Dover:
I am updating the Ceph documentation. Included in this email is a proposed change to the documentation and a request for information pertaining to that proposed change. If you know about the issue behind the proposed change and you have information pertinent to it that you would like to enshrine in the documentation, reply to this email and tell me.
Documentation Link: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/kube-helm/
Proposed Change: Removing the Helm-related material from the documentation entirely.
Zac's Request: Can anyone provide a compelling reason for keeping the Helm documentation?
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-helm is unmaintained since two years already. Which means I really except this to fail to properly deploy an octopus cluster. Why keep an installation documentation that is going to fail? Everyone is using Rook nowadays.
As we still have the old documentations online ( https://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/ ), so users can still have a look, despite it being removed from octopus.
Best, Sebastian
Tracking Information (this can be ignored by everyone but Zac) Bug # 2 here: https://pad.ceph.com/p/Report_Documentation_Bugs
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
-- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
participants (2)
-
John Zachary Dover
-
Sebastian Wagner