CLT Meeting minutes 2023-07-05
Hello! Releasing Reef --------------------- * RC2 is out but we still have several PRs to go, including blockers. * RC3 might be worth doing but we Reef shall go before end of the month. Misc ------- * For the sake of unittesting of dencoders interoperatbility we're going to impose some extra work (like registering types within ceph-dencoder) on developers writing encodable structs. This will be discussed further in a CDM. * A lab issue got fixed. Regards Radek
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:37 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello!
Releasing Reef --------------------- * RC2 is out but we still have several PRs to go, including blockers. * RC3 might be worth doing but we Reef shall go before end of the month.
Misc ------- * For the sake of unittesting of dencoders interoperatbility we're going to impose some extra work (like registering types within ceph-dencoder) on developers writing encodable structs. This will be discussed further in a CDM.
Do we have a plan for enforcing this in PRs or compilation somehow? (Deep magic with using the macros and checking the struct under encode is in a list somewhere?) I’m all for this but if it’s not enforced we’re guaranteed to miss things. :/ -Greg
* A lab issue got fixed.
Regards Radek _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
Yes, the assumption no dencoding test facilities provided => compile-time failure. On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:45 PM Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:37 PM Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello!
Releasing Reef --------------------- * RC2 is out but we still have several PRs to go, including blockers. * RC3 might be worth doing but we Reef shall go before end of the month.
Misc ------- * For the sake of unittesting of dencoders interoperatbility we're going to impose some extra work (like registering types within ceph-dencoder) on developers writing encodable structs. This will be discussed further in a CDM.
Do we have a plan for enforcing this in PRs or compilation somehow? (Deep magic with using the macros and checking the struct under encode is in a list somewhere?) I’m all for this but if it’s not enforced we’re guaranteed to miss things. :/ -Greg
* A lab issue got fixed.
Regards Radek _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io
participants (2)
-
Gregory Farnum
-
Radoslaw Zarzynski