10 Oct
2019
10 Oct
'19
7:17 a.m.
Latest static analyser results are up on http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
--
Cheers,
Brad
10 Oct
10 Oct
7:41 a.m.
This is awesome!
How difficult would it be to add these as cmake targets?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:18 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Latest static analyser results are up on
http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
--
Cheers,
Brad
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
11 Oct
11 Oct
7:44 a.m.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is awesome!
First thing to note is these scans each take a long time to run.
How difficult would it be to add these as cmake
targets?
With Coverity, currently impossible since the only version I can find
that works is not publicly available.
As for the others I use the following script to run them so it
wouldn't be that hard I guess. There's some changes in there at the
moment to try and get them to only scan 'ceph code' (not submodule
code) but that seems to be confusing scan-build as it currently
produces zero results. I have some work to do there and there seems to
be a lot of maintenance work around these scans. I'm not sure how much
bang for our buck we would get by adding any of them as cmake targets.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:18 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Latest static analyser results are up on http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
>
> Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Cheers,
Brad
12 Nov
12 Nov
8:04 p.m.
Hi Brad,
Thanks for providing the script! I added 2 of the targets to the cmake
system in this PR [1].
Still working on scan-build.
As a side note, on Fedora30, the iwyu version is pretty old, and
create many false positives, I had to build and install from source.
Yuval
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/31579
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:45 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is awesome!
First thing to note is these scans each take a long time to run.
How difficult would it be to add these as cmake
targets?
With Coverity, currently impossible since the only version I can find
that works is not publicly available.
As for the others I use the following script to run them so it
wouldn't be that hard I guess. There's some changes in there at the
moment to try and get them to only scan 'ceph code' (not submodule
code) but that seems to be confusing scan-build as it currently
produces zero results. I have some work to do there and there seems to
be a lot of maintenance work around these scans. I'm not sure how much
bang for our buck we would get by adding any of them as cmake targets.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:18 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Latest static analyser results are up on http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
>
> Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Cheers,
Brad
13 Nov
13 Nov
11:24 p.m.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:04 AM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Brad,
Hi Yuval,
Thanks for providing the script! I added 2 of the
targets to the cmake
system in this PR [1].
Still working on scan-build.
As a side note, on Fedora30, the iwyu version is pretty old, and
create many false positives, I had to build and install from source.
I don't think adding additional dependencies to ceph for this is a
good idea. If we are to implement this, given this is strictly for
developers, I would suggest we make satisfying the dependencies for
these cmake options a manual process and avoid pulling in more
dependencies. What do you think?
Yuval
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/31579
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:45 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Cheers,
Brad
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is awesome!
First thing to note is these scans each take a long time to run.
How difficult would it be to add these as cmake
targets?
With Coverity, currently impossible since the only version I can find
that works is not publicly available.
As for the others I use the following script to run them so it
wouldn't be that hard I guess. There's some changes in there at the
moment to try and get them to only scan 'ceph code' (not submodule
code) but that seems to be confusing scan-build as it currently
produces zero results. I have some work to do there and there seems to
be a lot of maintenance work around these scans. I'm not sure how much
bang for our buck we would get by adding any of them as cmake targets.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:18 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Latest static analyser results are up on http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
>
> Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Cheers,
Brad
14 Nov
14 Nov
7:53 a.m.
Yes, I agree. Especially that, at least ion fedora, iwyu should be
built from source.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:24 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:04 AM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Brad,
Hi Yuval,
Thanks for providing the script! I added 2 of the
targets to the cmake
system in this PR [1].
Still working on scan-build.
As a side note, on Fedora30, the iwyu version is pretty old, and
create many false positives, I had to build and install from source.
I don't think adding additional dependencies to ceph for this is a
good idea. If we are to implement this, given this is strictly for
developers, I would suggest we make satisfying the dependencies for
these cmake options a manual process and avoid pulling in more
dependencies. What do you think?
Yuval
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/31579
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:45 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
--
Cheers,
Brad
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yuval Lifshitz <ylifshit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This is awesome!
First thing to note is these scans each take a long time to run.
How difficult would it be to add these as cmake
targets?
With Coverity, currently impossible since the only version I can find
that works is not publicly available.
As for the others I use the following script to run them so it
wouldn't be that hard I guess. There's some changes in there at the
moment to try and get them to only scan 'ceph code' (not submodule
code) but that seems to be confusing scan-build as it currently
produces zero results. I have some work to do there and there seems to
be a lot of maintenance work around these scans. I'm not sure how much
bang for our buck we would get by adding any of them as cmake targets.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:18 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Latest static analyser results are up on http://people.redhat.com/bhubbard/
>
> Weekly Fedora Copr builds are at
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/badone/ceph-weeklies/
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
--
Cheers,
Brad
1634
days inactive
1669
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Brad Hubbard -
Yuval Lifshitz