thank you Igor!
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:45 PM Igor Fedotov <ifedotov(a)suse.de> wrote:
Hi Kefu and Adam,
curious whether we have reliable enough set of numbers on how spatially
efficient btree allocator is? I recall some Adam's comment in the PR
showing 2x saving in BTree allocator vs. AVL on.
no, probably not reliable or enough. could you shed some light on how
i can get some reliable numbers? shall i run some load on an osd and
check the memory consumption of the allocator? if yes, do we have any
(recommended) benchmark for profiling the disk allocators?
But the data set there seems to be relatively small - total consumed RAM
is just a few MBs. Anything else available?
not so far.
I recall Adam promised to run more vast testing at perf meeting....
i see. will wait for his update then if we don't have a standardized test yet.
Thanks,
Igor
On 6/25/2021 11:35 AM, Kefu Chai wrote:
hi Adam,
while looking at Hybrid Allocator [0] and the newly introduced Btree
Allocator [1], i am wondering if we still need the bitmap allocator to
cap the memory usage due to the large overhead of AVL allocator?
because btree is much more spatially efficient than AVL tree.
cheers
---
[0]
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33365
[1]
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41828
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io