13 Nov
2020
13 Nov
'20
8:10 p.m.
Details of this release summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
early next week.
Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
rados - approved Neha?
rgw - approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel-nautilus (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-mimic (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-luminous-nautilus (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-nautilus-octopus-octopus (octopus) - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/luminous-x (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-x (octopus) - in progress
ceph-volume - in progress (Jan pls see)
Thx
YuriW
13 Nov
13 Nov
8:42 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 2:10 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Details of this release summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
early next week.
Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
rados - approved Neha?
rgw - approved Casey?
rgw approved
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel-nautilus (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-mimic (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-luminous-nautilus (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/client-upgrade-nautilus-octopus-octopus (octopus) - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/luminous-x (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-x (octopus) - in progress
ceph-volume - in progress (Jan pls see)
Thx
YuriW
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
8:48 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 8:10 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Details of this release summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
early next week.
Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
rados - approved Neha?
rgw - approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
Approved.
Thanks,
Ilya
8:49 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Details of this release summarized here:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
early next week.
Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
rados - approved Neha?
rgw - approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
"2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR] Health
check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in cluster
log
From: https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
look like they have loaded successfully.
Otherwise the runs look good to me but this warning needs addressed.
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
8:56 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230 - this is appearing in RADOS
too, but I think it is harmless
Neha
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Details of this release summarized here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
>
> Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
> early next week.
> Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
>
> rados - approved Neha?
approved
rgw - approved
Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
"2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR] Health
check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in cluster
log
From:
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
look like they have loaded successfully.
Otherwise the runs look good to me but this warning needs addressed.
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
9:18 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230 - this is appearing in RADOS
too, but I think it is harmless
It does look harmless but do we know why it's happening though?
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Details of this release summarized here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
>
> Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
> early next week.
> Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
>
> rados - approved Neha?
approved
rgw -
approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
"2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR] Health
check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in cluster
log
From:
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
look like they have loaded successfully. 
9:24 p.m.
On 11/13/2020 12:18 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Neha Ojha
<nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It's odd, because the mgr log for the job cited in the bug shows a lot
of what look like normal status messages from rbd_support (at least)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230 - this is appearing in RADOS
too, but I think it is harmless
It does look harmless but do we know why it's happening though?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Details of this release summarized here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
>
> Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
> early next week.
> Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
>
> rados - approved Neha?
approved
rgw -
approved Casey?
rbd - approved Jason?
krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
fs - approved Patrick?
We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
"2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR] Health
check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in cluster
log
From:
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
look like they have loaded successfully.
10:24 p.m.
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230#note-2 is what seems to be the
problem, though I don't understand it fully yet, could be related to
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/37844.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:24 PM Dan Mick <dmick(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/13/2020 12:18 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Neha Ojha
<nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It's odd, because the mgr log for the job cited in the bug shows a lot
of what look like normal status messages from rbd_support (at least)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It does look harmless but do we know why it's happening though?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Details of this release summarized here:
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
>
> Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date -
> early next week.
> Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the weekend)
>
> rados - approved Neha?
approved
> rgw - approved Casey?
> rbd - approved Jason?
> krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
> fs - approved Patrick?
We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
"2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR] Health
check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in cluster
log
From:
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
look like they have loaded successfully.
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230 - this is appearing in RADOS
too, but I think it is harmless
10:39 p.m.
Ok, looks like we need https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/35760 in
nautilus as well, it was backported only to octopus. I have updated
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46224 accordingly.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:24 PM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230#note-2 is what seems to be the
problem, though I don't understand it fully yet, could be related to
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/37844.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:24 PM Dan Mick <dmick(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/13/2020 12:18 PM, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Patrick Donnelly
<pdonnell(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:10 AM Yuri Weinstein
<yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Details of this release summarized here:
> >>>> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
> >>>>
> >>>> Asking dev leads for early approval as we target the release date
-
> >>>> early next week.
> >>>> Some suites are still in progress (will try to finish over the
weekend)
> >>>>
> >>>> rados - approved Neha?
> >>
> >> approved
> >>
> >>>> rgw - approved Casey?
> >>>> rbd - approved Jason?
> >>>> krbd - approved Jason, Ilya?
> >>>> fs - approved Patrick?
> >>>
> >>> We now have a warning in the cluster log about mgr modules failing:
> >>>
> >>> "2020-11-12 23:11:43.631135 mon.b (mon.0) 100 : cluster [ERR]
Health
> >>> check failed: 3 mgr modules have failed (MGR_MODULE_ERROR)" in
cluster
> >>> log
> >>>
> >>> From:
https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic…
> >>>
> >>> e.g.:
/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-11-12_20:43:15-fs-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/5617317/remote/smithi045/log/ceph-mgr.x.log.gz
> >>>
> >>> I don't see why this warning is happening. The modules in question
> >>> look like they have loaded successfully.
> >>
> >> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48230 - this is appearing in RADOS
> >> too, but I think it is harmless
> >
> > It does look harmless but do we know why it's happening though?
> >
>
> It's odd, because the mgr log for the job cited in the bug shows a lot
> of what look like normal status messages from rbd_support (at least)
>
10:49 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:39:15PM -0800, Neha Ojha wrote:
Ok, looks like we need
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/35760 in
nautilus as well, it was backported only to octopus. I have updated
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46224 accordingly.
Backport PR is up: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069
Nathan
11:40 p.m.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069 => starting testing in
parallel with other tests in progress.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:50 PM Nathan Cutler <ncutler(a)suse.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 01:39:15PM -0800, Neha Ojha wrote:
Ok, looks like we need
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/35760 in
nautilus as well, it was backported only to octopus. I have updated
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46224 accordingly.
Backport PR is up: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069
Nathan
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
16 Nov
16 Nov
9:24 a.m.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38076 is a simple fix for a failing
test if we can squeeze it in?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 9:29 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069 tested, approved and megred
--
Cheers,
Brad
5:14 p.m.
If it's (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38076) ready as is, we can merge it.
Neha, Josh ?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:25 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38076 is a simple fix for a failing
test if we can squeeze it in?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 9:29 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069 tested, approved and megred
--
Cheers,
Brad
5:15 p.m.
Josh, David
This is ready for LRC upgrade and final approval.
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48170#note-1
5:50 p.m.
Yes, it's fine to merge since it's only changing a test.
On 11/16/20 8:14 AM, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
If it's (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38076)
ready as is, we can merge it.
Neha, Josh ?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:25 AM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38076 is a simple fix for a failing
test if we can squeeze it in?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 9:29 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38069 tested, approved and megred
--
Cheers,
Brad
6:10 p.m.
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
rados - approved Neha?
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls confirm
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
6:40 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
approved!
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
6:54 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com> wrote:
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
rados - approved Neha?
approved
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls confirm
approved
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
18 Nov
18 Nov
11:08 p.m.
Hi. Is there any estimate time for nautilus 14.2.14 based on new CVE?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein
<yweinste(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
rados - approved Neha?
approved
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls confirm
approved
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
11:17 p.m.
New subject: [Ceph-qa] Re: 14.2.14 Nautilus validation status
Later today for both nautilus and octopus.
On 11/18/20 2:08 PM, Seena Fallah wrote:
Hi. Is there any estimate time for nautilus 14.2.14
based on new CVE?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com
<mailto:nojha@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com
<mailto:yweinste@redhat.com>> wrote:
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
<https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1>
rados - approved Neha?
approved
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls
confirm
approved
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io <mailto:dev@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
<mailto:dev-leave@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
Ceph-qa mailing list -- ceph-qa(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-qa-leave(a)ceph.io
19 Nov
19 Nov
3:18 p.m.
New subject: [Ceph-qa] Re: 14.2.14 Nautilus validation status
Fo rceph-volume, we really need for
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38046 to make it in 14.2.14,
otherwise, both .13 and .14 won't be usable to deploy Ceph or expand
on upgraded cluster.
This is a major bug.
Thanks!
–––––––––
Sébastien Han
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Storage Architect
"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:17 PM Josh Durgin <jdurgin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Later today for both nautilus and octopus.
On 11/18/20 2:08 PM, Seena Fallah wrote:
Hi. Is there any estimate time for nautilus
14.2.14 based on new CVE?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com
<mailto:nojha@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com
<mailto:yweinste@redhat.com>> wrote:
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
<https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1>
rados - approved Neha?
approved
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls
confirm
approved
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io <mailto:dev@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
<mailto:dev-leave@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
Ceph-qa mailing list -- ceph-qa(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-qa-leave(a)ceph.io
4:39 p.m.
New subject: [Ceph-qa] Re: 14.2.14 Nautilus validation status
I will ceph-volume tests on it so we can merge soon
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:18 AM Sebastien Han <shan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Fo rceph-volume, we really need for
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/38046 to make it in 14.2.14,
otherwise, both .13 and .14 won't be usable to deploy Ceph or expand
on upgraded cluster.
This is a major bug.
Thanks!
–––––––––
Sébastien Han
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Storage Architect
"Always give 100%. Unless you're giving blood."
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:17 PM Josh Durgin <jdurgin(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Later today for both nautilus and octopus.
On 11/18/20 2:08 PM, Seena Fallah wrote:
Hi. Is there any estimate time for nautilus
14.2.14 based on new CVE?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:24 PM Neha Ojha <nojha(a)redhat.com
<mailto:nojha@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste(a)redhat.com
<mailto:yweinste@redhat.com>> wrote:
See summary
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1
<https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48200#note-1>
rados - approved Neha?
approved
rbd - approved Jason?
fs - approved Patrick?
multimds - approved Patrick?
ceph-deploy - in progress
upgrade/nautilus-p2 - in progress
upgrade/mimic-x (nautilus) - Neha, seems like a known issue, pls
confirm
approved
ceph-volume - FAILED, Jan approved?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev(a)ceph.io <mailto:dev@ceph.io>
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave(a)ceph.io
<mailto:dev-leave@ceph.io>
_______________________________________________
Ceph-qa mailing list -- ceph-qa(a)ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-qa-leave(a)ceph.io
15 Nov
15 Nov
11:25 a.m.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:56:13AM -0800, Neha Ojha wrote:
Just wondering, don't we want the fix for [1] to be backported before
the next nautilus release?
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48153
--
Mykola Golub
> rados -
approved Neha?
approved
1264
days inactive
1270
days old
23 comments
12 participants
participants (12)
-
Brad Hubbard -
Casey Bodley -
Dan Mick -
Ilya Dryomov -
Josh Durgin -
Mykola Golub -
Nathan Cutler -
Neha Ojha -
Patrick Donnelly -
Sebastien Han -
Seena Fallah -
Yuri Weinstein