Hi Abhinav,

I'm having trouble reading the labels clearly, I have to admit.    Still, this looks like a great start on "core" op processing.

I'm unsure of your available time.  It would be super to work horizontally across more ops.  It also makes sense to go deeper--but especially, to be able to jump across (I think) two domains that are off the left and right edges.  To the left, it seems you can go some ways into the HTTP front-end (in that direction, I think we care about Beast and maybe not Civetweb so much).  Meanwhile, to the right, most ops are pushing down into Ceph RADOS ops, and it would be particularly nice to trace across RGW high-level ops, into the underlying RADOS ops that work against the Ceph cluster.

In fine, nice work.

Matt

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:00 PM Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav0796@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello everyone,

I m implementing a jaeger tracing system in RGW, some images below

For deleting a object

for getting the list of buckets in clusters

I have two tags in jaegerUI to filter various spans one is gateway(swift or s3) and another is RGwOpeartion type like for example putting an object has a name  "RGW_OP_PUT_OBJ".

is this much detail sufficient? or should I go more deep into each functions and try to trace those.

Also what should any improvement and changes I can make into this to make this more developer friendly.

Thank you

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

--

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309