I think when OPA integration is enabled the source of truth for authorizing should be OPA (it is right now in Ceph and all requests are authorizing with OPA and Ceph doesn’t authorize any request by it self).
When user is using bucket policy feature he/she wants to get access to someone else so when he/she is the bucket owner, he/she can perform this action and we should apply this policy for him/her. If we want policies just update within OPA server/client and S3 clients (s3cmd, aws, ...) don’t edit policies, we should reply to them that set/delpolicy isn’t allowed from here (return 405 for example; just for saying that the request that user send isn’t successful).
Yes we can have some process and simplification before sending it to OPA but the s3 policy has a general structure so OPA server can decode it by it self.
The larger question, I think, is what OPA is supposed to do with it.
The larger question I think it asks is whether OPA or Ceph owns a
particular dimension of policy--or, perhaps, which owns policy for
what portions of the namespace (at any particular point in time).
Without any new interaction, when OPA is configured, OPA can make a
direct authorization decision with all available information for
Ceph/RGW, notwithstanding any S3 or Swift ACL or S3 policy that might
exist--including any that might have been stored prior to turning on
this proposed feature to push policy documents to OPA. This
overriding property of the OPA integration when in use frees us from a
lot of complexity regarding which system is the source of truth, and
I can see value in more sophisticated integration that mutually
comprehends policy--but I'm having trouble with "send policy documents
to OPA, maybe it will do something with them."
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:01 PM Seena Fallah <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hello Ash
> With bucket policy user A can get access to user B for putting object on bucket C. So if this policy sent to Ceph and OPA integration is enabled it will be discard because this policy isn’t sent to OPA server to be updated.
> Here is a documentation for bucket policy:
> With this PR when user set bucket policy, the data of that policy will sent to OPA server to be applied and so OPA can get access to user that gets access to bucket via bucket policy.
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:24 PM Ash Narkar <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Hello Seena,
>> The OPA integration is with the RGW and the intent is to check if an authenticated user is allowed to perform a particular action on a particular resource. For example, can Bob delete a bucket based on some attribute like his location. I am not familiar with the internals of Ceph's bucket policy command. It would be great to get some context here and discuss if the bucket policy can be authorized with OPA which is the intent of your PR I believe.
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 6:33 AM Seena Fallah <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> So when OPA integration is enabled the bucket policy from users will not work!
>>> I think it’s about Ceph architecture not OPA because OPA is for authorizing the requests and bucket policy is one of the authorizing methods that OPA should support.
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:56 PM Matt Benjamin <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Seena,
>>>> As I wrote in a comment on your PR, my current intuition is that what
>>>> you're doing here isn't consistent with the original intent of the OPA
>>>> integration we currently have, nor with the OPA model in general.
>>>> That said, I'd really like some feedback from OPA architects, CC'd.
>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:04 AM Seena Fallah <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> > Hi all. In OPA integration from Ceph there is no integration for bucket policy.
>>>> > When user is setting bucket policy to his/her bucket the OPA server won't get who get's access to that bucket so after that if the request is coming from the user (that gets access to that bucket via bucket policy) to access that bucket (PUT, GET,...), OPA will reject that because of no data in database.
>>>> > I have create a pull request for this problem so if user creates a bucket policy for his/her bucket, the policy data will send to OPA server to be update on the database.
>>>> > I think the main idea of having OPA is to have all authorization in OPA and Ceph don't authorize any request by it self.
>>>> > Here is the pull request and I would be thankful to hear about your comments.
>>>> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/32294
>>>> > Thanks.
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Dev mailing list -- email@example.com
>>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
>>>> Matt Benjamin
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
>>>> Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103
>>>> tel. 734-821-5101
>>>> fax. 734-769-8938
>>>> cel. 734-216-5309
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103