Very much a side note: At once point the Ubuntu (and I think Debian)
packages weren't being built with tcmalloc support. I talked to Chris
Macnaughton about it back at Cephalocon and he verified it was the case
for the Ubuntu packages, but he's moved on and is no longer at
Canonical. It would be nice to verify if this is still (or for Debian
ever was) the case and get it resolved.

Thanks again for bringing this to our attention. We resolved the build issue with tcmalloc in Ubuntu packages.

The regression was introduced when Ubuntu enabled the crimson backend for testing [0]. This regression only impacted Ubuntu, not Debian.

[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/2016845/comments/4

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 7:24 PM Mark Nelson <mark.nelson@clyso.com> wrote:

On 9/29/23 11:01, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> When I started looking into ceph I've removed lots of stuff from the
> debian folder that the ubuntu people added for unknown reasons, its
> much closer to upstream these days then it was before. Actually close
> enough that it is no problem to switch to the upstream packages at all.

Very much a side note: At once point the Ubuntu (and I think Debian)
packages weren't being built with tcmalloc support. I talked to Chris
Macnaughton about it back at Cephalocon and he verified it was the case
for the Ubuntu packages, but he's moved on and is no longer at
Canonical. It would be nice to verify if this is still (or for Debian
ever was) the case and get it resolved.

Mark

--
Best Regards,
Mark Nelson
Head of Research and Development

Clyso GmbH
p: +49 89 21552391 12 | a: Minnesota, USA
w: https://clyso.com | e: mark.nelson@clyso.com

We are hiring: https://www.clyso.com/jobs/
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io