Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote on 18.07.2019 17:00:18:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Hi Sage,
> >
> > > I think the cleanest thing is to s/__le/ceph_le/ everywhere *except*
> > > msgr.h, rados.h, and ceph_fs.h.  It seems like what happened was we
> > mostly
> > > forgot to always use the ceph_ variant after 2010.
> > >
> > > That should resolve the issue, right?
> >
> > That's what we've tried to do, and it does indeed make work Ceph a lot
> > better on IBM Z (still some issues, but probably unrelated).  Once we've
> > gotten a bit farther with testing, we can certainly send patches to
> > that effect.
>
> Great, thanks!

I've now opened issue https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/41605 to track
this, and posted a first set of fixes as pull request:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/30079

Bye,
Ulrich