Hi Guys,
Earlier this week I was working on investigating the impact of OMAP
performance on RGW and wanted to see if putting rocksdb on ramdisk would
help speed up bucket index updates. While running tests I found out
that the benchmark tool I was using consumed roughly 15 cores of CPU to
push 4K puts/second to RGW from 128 threads. That wasn't really viable,
so I started looking for alternate S3 benchmarking tools. COSBench is
sort of the most well known choice out there, but it's a bit cumbersome
if you just want to run some quick tests from the command-line.
I managed to find a simple yet very nice benchmark written in go
developed by Wasabi Inc called s3-benchmark. While it works well, it
really only targets single buckets and is designed more for AWS testing
than for Ceph. I forked the project and pretty much refactored the
whole thing to be more useful for the kind of testing I want to do.
It's now at the point where I think it might be ready to experiment
with. S3 benchmarking has been a semi-recurring topic on the list so I
figured other folks might be interested in trying it too and hopefully
providing feedback.
The new benchmark is called hsbench and it's available here:
https://github.com/markhpc/hsbench
See the README.md for some of the advantages over the original
s3-benchmark program it was forked from. I consider this release to be
alpha level quality and disclaim all responsibility if it breaks and
deletes every object in all of your buckets. Consider yourself warned. :)
Mark
Dear Purchasing Manager,
Hope this mail find you well.
With over 10 years experience specializing in EVA packaging boxes and cases in China, we enjoy high reputation among some famous brands like TOMTOM (for GPS) and Philips (for Shaver).
From your website, we know that you make electronic products, would you like the popular eva packaging case?
***Compare to normal packing, advantage of our EVA case:
1. Reusable and environment-friendly material agrees with European & USA norms, SGS reports available.
2. Waterproof, shockproof, drop resistance and light weight.
3. Customerized design is welcomed.
4. Low mould cost and low MOQ.
Best Regards,
Cicy Chan
*******************************************
Guangzhou Hong Yang Sci-Tech Venture Co. Ltd.
Tel: +86 1856534244
Address: 1st Floor, No.38, Fuyuan North Road, Huangcun,Tianhe District, Guangzhou, China 510660.
I'd like to test how reweighting an OSD will change how the PGs map in the
cluster.
I suspect that I'd dump the CRUSH map and PGs in the cluster that I'm
interested in then use osdmaptool. I'm not understanding how to use
osdmaptool to set the reweight, then query a PG or the entire set of PGs
that I'm interested in. I then suspect that if I'm okay with the new map
that I could inject it into the cluster instead of having to run reweight
on the OSD(s).
This is a Jewel cluster and I'm trying to calculate OSD usage offline, then
inject a map that is more distributed instead of doing a reweight, move the
PGs which take a long time to just rinse and repeat over and over again.
Thanks,
Robert LeBlanc
----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1