ceph user list respone - ceph-users - lists.ceph.io

newer
rbd lvm xfs fstrim vs rbd xfs...

ceph user list respone

older
ceph-fuse non-privileged user mount

Frank R

25 Nov 2019 25 Nov '19

9:10 p.m.

Hi, For your response: "You should use not more 1Gb for WAL and 30Gb for RocksDB. Numbers ! 3,30,300 (Gb) for block.db is useless. " Do you mean the block.db size should be 3, 30 or 300GB and nothing else? If so, thy not? Thanks, Frank

Attachments:

attachment.htm (text/html — 411 bytes)

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Konstantin Shalygin

26 Nov 26 Nov

4:42 a.m.

On 11/26/19 4:10 AM, Frank R wrote:

Do you mean the block.db size should be 3, 30 or 300GB and nothing else?

Yes, if not - you will get data spillover of your RocksDB to slow_db at compaction rounds. k

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

2492

Age (days ago)

2493

Last active (days ago)

Download

1 comments

2 participants

tags

participants (2)

Frank R
Konstantin Shalygin