Hello, We use purely cephfs in out ceph cluster (version 14.2.7). The cephfs data is an EC pool (k=4, m=2) with hdd OSDs using bluestore. The default file layout (i.e. 4MB object size) is used. We see the following output of ceph df: --- RAW STORAGE: CLASS SIZE AVAIL USED RAW USED %RAW USED hdd 951 TiB 888 TiB 63 TiB 63 TiB 6.58 ssd 9.6 TiB 9.6 TiB 1.4 GiB 16 GiB 0.17 TOTAL 961 TiB 898 TiB 63 TiB 63 TiB 6.52 POOLS: POOL ID STORED OBJECTS USED %USE D MAX AVAIL cephfs-data 2 34 TiB 12.51M 52 TiB 5.93 553 TiB cephfs-metadata 4 994 MiB 98.61k 1.5 GiB 0.02 3.0 TiB --- What triggered my attention is the discrepency between the reported size of "USED" (52 TiB) and "STORED" (34 TiB) on the cephfs-data pool. From this document ( https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/nautilus/#upgrade-compatibility-n... ), it says that - "USED" represents amount of space allocated purely for data by all OSD nodes in KB - "STORED" represents amount of data stored by the user. I seem to undersand that the "USED" size can be roughly taken as the number of objects (12.51M) times the object size (4MB) of the file layout; and since there are many files with size smaller than 4 MB in our system, the actual stored data is less. Is my interpretation correct? If so, does it mean that we will be wasting a lot of space when we have a lot files smaller than the object size of 4MB in the system? Thanks for the help! Cheers, Hong -- Hurng-Chun (Hong) Lee, PhD ICT manager Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University Nijmegen e-mail: h.lee@donders.ru.nl tel: +31(0) 243610977 web: http://www.ru.nl/donders/