Is cephfs multi-volume support stable?
Hello, I found that documentation on the Internet on the question whether I can safely have two instances of cephfs in my cluster is inconsistent. For the record, I don't use snapshots. FOSDEM 19 presentation by Sage Weil: https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/ceph_project_status_update/at... Slide 25 is specifically devoted to this topic, and declares multi-volume support as stable. But, https://docs.ceph.com/en/nautilus/cephfs/experimental-features/ declares that multiple filesystems in the same cluster are an experimental feature, and the "latest" version of the same doc makes the same claim. What should I believe - the presentation or the official docs? -- Alexander E. Patrakov CV: http://pc.cd/PLz7
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:56 PM Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I found that documentation on the Internet on the question whether I can safely have two instances of cephfs in my cluster is inconsistent. For the record, I don't use snapshots.
FOSDEM 19 presentation by Sage Weil: https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/ceph_project_status_update/at...
Slide 25 is specifically devoted to this topic, and declares multi-volume support as stable.
But, https://docs.ceph.com/en/nautilus/cephfs/experimental-features/ declares that multiple filesystems in the same cluster are an experimental feature, and the "latest" version of the same doc makes the same claim.
What should I believe - the presentation or the official docs?
We expect to make multi-fs stable in Pacific. -- Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D. He / Him / His Principal Software Engineer Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
participants (2)
-
Alexander E. Patrakov
-
Patrick Donnelly