Re: resize/extend pool/fs storage size?
-> $ ceph balancer status { "active": true, "last_optimize_duration": "0:00:00.001667", "last_optimize_started": "Mon Mar 2 04:08:35 2026", "mode": "upmap", "no_optimization_needed": true, "optimize_result": "Unable to find further optimization, or pool(s) pg_num is decreasing, or distribution is already perfect", "plans": [] } -> $ ceph osd tree ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME STATUS REWEIGHT PRI-AFF -1 1.07428 root default -3 0.34180 host podster1 9 ssd 0.04880 osd.9 up 1.00000 1.00000 10 ssd 0.29300 osd.10 up 1.00000 1.00000 -7 0.39069 host podster2 0 ssd 0.09769 osd.0 up 1.00000 1.00000 4 ssd 0.29300 osd.4 up 1.00000 1.00000 -5 0.34180 host podster3 1 ssd 0.04880 osd.1 up 1.00000 1.00000 5 ssd 0.29300 osd.5 up 1.00000 1.00000 -> $ ceph osd dump | grep ratio full_ratio 0.95 backfillfull_ratio 0.9 nearfull_ratio 0.85 I've changed upmap_max_deviation = 1 I also did: -> $ ceph osd reweight osd.0 1.0 and ceased all clients' activity to FSes I've extend disk-devices ceph uses twice, for 'health' complained about 'backfillull' like here, only _pg_ was there, is is now below: -> $ ceph health detail HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull [WRN] OSD_BACKFILLFULL: 1 backfillfull osd(s) osd.0 is backfill full [WRN] PG_BACKFILL_FULL: Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull pg 3.1b is active+remapped+backfill_toofull, acting [4,5,10] pg 3.21 is active+remapped+backfill_toofull, acting [4,5,10] pg 3.23 is active+remapped+backfill_toofull, acting [10,5,4] [WRN] POOL_BACKFILLFULL: 5 pool(s) backfillfull pool '.mgr' is backfillfull pool 'cephfs.APKI.meta' is backfillfull pool 'cephfs.APKI.data' is backfillfull pool 'cephfs.MONERO.meta' is backfillfull pool 'cephfs.MONERO.data' is backfillfull Each time I "extended" devices-disks, cluster went to use osd.0 and fill it up. Yes everything is small in this cluster, it's a lab. -> $ ceph -w cluster: id: 9f4f9dba-72c7-11f0-8052-525400519d29 health: HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s) Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull 5 pool(s) backfillfull services: mon: 3 daemons, quorum podster3,podster2,podster1 (age 2d) [leader: podster3] mgr: podster1.qzojrl(active, since 2d), standbys: podster3.kyyolr mds: 2/2 daemons up, 2 standby osd: 6 osds: 6 up (since 12h), 6 in (since 2d); 3 remapped pgs data: volumes: 2/2 healthy pools: 5 pools, 289 pgs objects: 102.74k objects, 355 GiB usage: 1.1 TiB used, 523 GiB / 1.6 TiB avail pgs: 737/308229 objects misplaced (0.239%) 286 active+clean 3 active+remapped+backfill_toofull 2026-03-02T04:10:00.000125+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] overall HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull 2026-03-02T04:20:00.000091+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] overall HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull 2026-03-02T04:26:38.174003+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] Health check failed: Reduced data availability: 1 pg peering (PG_AVAILABILITY) 2026-03-02T04:26:44.210790+0000 mon.podster3 [INF] Health check cleared: PG_AVAILABILITY (was: Reduced data availability: 1 pg peering) 2026-03-02T04:30:00.000140+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] overall HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull 2026-03-02T04:40:00.000118+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] overall HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull 2026-03-02T04:50:00.000114+0000 mon.podster3 [WRN] overall HEALTH_WARN 1 backfillfull osd(s); Low space hindering backfill (add storage if this doesn't resolve itself): 3 pgs backfill_toofull; 5 pool(s) backfillfull If the cluster is doing something good, something it should be doing to heal, it's barely happening so slow it is - given no clients work now + as you said, storage capacities are minute in comparison to anything production. 7 hours later, still: -> $ ceph osd df tree | egrep '(osd.0|ID)' ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME 0 ssd 0.09769 1.00000 150 GiB 140 GiB 88 GiB 1.0 MiB 2.0 GiB 10 GiB 93.29 1.37 72 up osd.0 Now 5 hours later - since i started this draft - I added: -> $ ceph osd reweight-by-utilization and before that cmd above I also noticed: -> $ ceph config get mgr mgr/balancer/begin_weekday 0 -> $ ceph config get mgr mgr/balancer/end_weekday 0 which was done by 'deployment' process - cephadm bootstrap - and made me wonder: does that mean that auto-rebalance runs only on Sunday? I changed: end_weekday = 6 _reweight-by-utilization_ I notice, changed REWEIGHT for osd.0 and that did something, I think. So now _active+remapped+backfill_toofull_ are gone from 'pcs' part of health report. RAW USE & DATA are down, but stil: -> $ ceph osd df tree | egrep '(osd.0|ID)' ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME 0 ssd 0.09769 0.90002 150 GiB 134 GiB 82 GiB 1.1 MiB 2.0 GiB 16 GiB 89.51 1.31 68 up osd.0 and when compared to other host-ods which use "identical" disk-drives: -> $ ceph osd df tree | egrep '(osd\.[0,1,9] |ID)' ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME 9 ssd 0.04880 1.00000 150 GiB 52 GiB 51 GiB 624 KiB 1.4 GiB 98 GiB 34.83 0.51 43 up osd.9 0 ssd 0.09769 0.90002 150 GiB 134 GiB 82 GiB 1.1 MiB 2.0 GiB 16 GiB 89.51 1.31 68 up osd.0 1 ssd 0.04880 1.00000 150 GiB 53 GiB 53 GiB 526 KiB 254 MiB 97 GiB 35.40 0.52 44 up osd.1 Perhaps cluster goes only as far as to satisfy _backfill_toofull_ be gone and then "gives up"? The "other" disk-drives: -> $ ceph osd df tree | egrep '(osd\.(5|4|10)\ |ID)' ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME 10 ssd 0.29300 1.00000 400 GiB 307 GiB 305 GiB 2.0 MiB 2.1 GiB 93 GiB 76.68 1.12 246 up osd.10 4 ssd 0.29300 1.00000 400 GiB 275 GiB 273 GiB 3.2 MiB 2.1 GiB 125 GiB 68.83 1.01 221 up osd.4 5 ssd 0.29300 1.00000 400 GiB 305 GiB 303 GiB 3.0 MiB 2.5 GiB 95 GiB 76.27 1.12 245 up osd.5 Seems that _host podster2_ balances its osds 4 & 0 "differently" to what other two hosts do - if so then why?
participants (1)
-
listy