I would also be interested in hearing from anyone who is successfully using nfs-ganesha in an HA configuration. Our internal tests have same results; unreliable, bogs down easily, etc. Looks like the version included with Ceph jumped from v5.5 (included with Reef) to v5.9 (included with Squid). But curious why it hasnt yet jumped to stable version v6.5? -Robert On 5/6/25 01:36, Nigel Williams wrote:

We deployed a new Cephadm Squid cluster (400 OSDs) and are happy with everything except this time we tried Ganesha again with the ingress option (HAproxy), but soon we ran into a failed daemon event.

And there is a github issue for it: https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/issues/1158

Our questions are: Is a hotfix pending for this github issue?

Is anyone using Ganesha with or without ingress, is it reliable for you?

How is the relative performance between Ganesha and kernel NFS?

We seem to try Ganesha every release but return to the usual kernel NFS server setup because Ganesha is unreliable, we would be interested to know what others in the community think about the Ganesha option.

thanks. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io