I reviewed rados here: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#httpstrackercephcomissues... Conferring with Radek first, then will update the thread to approve. On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:27 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1

Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD Gibba upgrade -TBD

Please provide tracks for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya

quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha

powercycle - Brad crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel

ceph-volume - Guillaume _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

-- Laura Flores She/Her/Hers Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io> Chicago, IL lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:27 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1

Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD Gibba upgrade -TBD

Please provide tracks for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya

Hi Yuri, Consider rbd and krbd approved, but if there is a respin I'd like to include https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61095 and a backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61129 (yet to merge). Thanks, Ilya

Hello and Happy Holidays all! We have merged several PRs (mostly in rgw and rbd areas) and I built a new build 2 (rebase) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1 Please provide trackers for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for: rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel ceph-volume - Guillaume On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:27 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1

Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD Gibba upgrade -TBD

Please provide tracks for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya

quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha

powercycle - Brad crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel

ceph-volume - Guillaume

Hello Yuri, ceph-volume approved Regards, -- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer From: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> Date: Friday, 27 December 2024 at 17:31 To: dev <dev@ceph.io>, ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status Hello and Happy Holidays all! We have merged several PRs (mostly in rgw and rbd areas) and I built a new build 2 (rebase) https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1 Please provide trackers for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for: rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel ceph-volume - Guillaume On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 9:27 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1

Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD Gibba upgrade -TBD

Please provide tracks for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya

quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha

powercycle - Brad crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel

ceph-volume - Guillaume

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above: Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z

Hey Yuri, On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:57 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

Details of this release are summarized here:

https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69234#note-1

Release Notes - TBD LRC upgrade - TBD Gibba upgrade -TBD

Please provide tracks for failures so we avoid duplicates. Seeking approvals/reviews for:

rados - Radek, Laura rgw - Eric, Adam E fs - Venky

fs approved. Failures are https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/wiki/Squid#squid-1921

orch - Adam King rbd, krbd - Ilya

quincy-x, reef-x - Laura, Neha

powercycle - Brad crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel

ceph-volume - Guillaume _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@ceph.io

-- Cheers, Venky

Adam You are looking at the old run for the build 1 See to lines for the Build 2 https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-12-24_16:19:43-rgw-squid-release-distro-... https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-12-26_16:29:28-rgw-squid-release-distro-... On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:51 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

On 27/12/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

rgw - Eric, Adam E

Could you please rerun the RGW tests here https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2024-12-15_15:57:04-rgw-squid-release-distro-...

I think we have a fix to the Java issue.

On 16/12/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

rgw - Eric, Adam E

Approved for RGW. Failures were in tests and we've got fixes for those now.

Rados and upgrade are approved: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1921-httpstrackercephcom... On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:32 PM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> wrote:

I am checking a few things for core and the upgrade suites, but should have a response soon.

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 11:25 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

...

On 16/12/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

rgw - Eric, Adam E

Approved for RGW. Failures were in tests and we've got fixes for those now. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

-- Laura Flores She/Her/Hers Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io> Chicago, IL lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

crimson-rados approved. The failures were fixed in main and were not backported to `squid` branch. This is acceptable as Squid is a tech preview of Crimson. Thank you, Matan On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:54 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

We are still missing some approvals:

crimson-rados - Matan, Samuel

Laura, unless you feel those are a must to have, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades.

On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 2:32 PM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Rados and upgrade are approved:

https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1921-httpstrackercephcom...

...

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:32 PM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> wrote:

...

I am checking a few things for core and the upgrade suites, but should have a response soon.

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 11:25 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

...

On 16/12/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

rgw - Eric, Adam E

Approved for RGW. Failures were in tests and we've got fixes for those now. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

This PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61306 was cherry-picked Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4 Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades. Also dev lead pls review/approve Release Notes https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61268 On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:12 AM Adam Emerson <aemerson@redhat.com> wrote:

On 07/01/2025, Adam Emerson wrote:

...

On 16/12/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

rgw - Eric, Adam E

Approved for RGW. Failures were in tests and we've got fixes for those now.

I apologize, but I am going to have to block for a critical fix. I will try to have it up and in today or tomorrow.

On 10/01/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

This PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61306 was cherry-picked Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4

Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades.

I hereby approve the RGW run. Thanks and sorry for the last minute fix.

The Gibba cluster has been upgraded. On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:27 AM Christian Rohmann < christian.rohmann@inovex.de> wrote:

Hey Adam,

On 11.01.25 12:52 AM, Adam Emerson wrote:

...

On 10/01/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

This PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61306 was cherry-picked Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4

Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades.

I hereby approve the RGW run. Thanks and sorry for the last minute fix.

Is the broken rgw_s3_auth_order https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/68393 not relevant enough for the release then? There is a PR open https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61162

Also there are some desperate comments about this breaking / hindering multi-site sync (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69183#note-4) which I totally agree with.

Regards

Christian

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

-- Laura Flores She/Her/Hers Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io> Chicago, IL lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804

On 15/01/2025, Christian Rohmann wrote:

Is the  broken rgw_s3_auth_order https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/68393 not relevant enough for the release then? There is a PR open https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/61162

Also there are some desperate comments about this breaking / hindering multi-site sync (https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/69183#note-4) which I totally agree with.

I apologize, but at this point, after talking to the team, blocking the release would derail enough things for enough people I can't really justify it. I've added the fix to v18.2.5, the upcoming Reef, and 19.2.2, the next squid, so it should be included in those.

Does this have to be cherry-picked to 19.2.1? What tests are to be rerun if yes? On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:21 AM Guillaume ABRIOUX <gabrioux@ibm.com> wrote:

Hello,

The rook ci must be failing because a `ceph-bluestore-tool` backport [1] is missing. This backport was merged ~6 hours ago.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60543

Regards,

-- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer ________________________________ De : Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> Envoyé : mercredi 15 janvier 2025 20:32 À : Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> Cc : Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>; dev <dev@ceph.io>; ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Objet : [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

When running the Rook CI against the latest squid devel image, we are seeing issues creating OSDs, investigating with Guillaume... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_rook_rook_issues_15282&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=3yKlL-fIl7-Q0HRnATPF5lC3gF6Fnz7Va_JNJMoK22g&e=

Travis

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:57 AM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> wrote:

...

The Gibba cluster has been upgraded.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:27 AM Christian Rohmann < christian.rohmann@inovex.de> wrote:

...

Hey Adam,

On 11.01.25 12:52 AM, Adam Emerson wrote:

...

On 10/01/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

...

This PR https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61306&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=AFPJEqe9WdKCH6e1-lQu7E9IQSmRerXeDEKed9RCL_4&e= was cherry-picked Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4

Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades.

I hereby approve the RGW run. Thanks and sorry for the last minute fix.

Is the broken rgw_s3_auth_order https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_68393&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=g0TCbLbCXpdqGmv5FG2ZQXn406ROsJCIzi7r2XT_9P4&e= not relevant enough for the release then? There is a PR open https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61162&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=iGdwR1eo5Tko2r9k5eB3y3YT251wCHI2AiMGzsdMFOM&e=

Also there are some desperate comments about this breaking / hindering multi-site sync (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_69183-23note-2D4&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=Xtf9Ig7h_WDIj7F6C-UIiHhd8Vj_xprX38C3DHVAl0M&e= ) which I totally agree with.

Regards

Christian

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ceph.io&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=e_CVR7WGo4-QP_VswyglgXv4hiKXEJkoP_N_rOYijYg&e= >

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above:

Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z

Although, I am not clear the difference between the squid branch since we started seeing this issue last week, and the 19.2.1 branch, so Guillaume or RADOS team should confirm for sure. On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:38 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

I confirmed that the Rook CI is now passing with the latest squid devel image that was pushed a couple hours ago, including this fix. It is a blocker for properly starting OSDs, at least for Rook. Guillaume was also able to repro the related issue outside Rook. So yes, please it needs to be included in 19.2.1.

Thanks, Travis

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:29 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Does this have to be cherry-picked to 19.2.1?

What tests are to be rerun if yes?

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:21 AM Guillaume ABRIOUX <gabrioux@ibm.com> wrote:

...

Hello,

The rook ci must be failing because a `ceph-bluestore-tool` backport

[1] is missing.

...

This backport was merged ~6 hours ago.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60543

Regards,

-- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer ________________________________ De : Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> Envoyé : mercredi 15 janvier 2025 20:32 À : Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> Cc : Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>; dev <dev@ceph.io>; ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Objet : [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

When running the Rook CI against the latest squid devel image, we are seeing issues creating OSDs, investigating with Guillaume...

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_rook_rook_issues_15282&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=3yKlL-fIl7-Q0HRnATPF5lC3gF6Fnz7Va_JNJMoK22g&e=

...

Travis

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:57 AM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

The Gibba cluster has been upgraded.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:27 AM Christian Rohmann < christian.rohmann@inovex.de> wrote:

...

Hey Adam,

On 11.01.25 12:52 AM, Adam Emerson wrote:

...

On 10/01/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > This PR

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61306&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=AFPJEqe9WdKCH6e1-lQu7E9IQSmRerXeDEKed9RCL_4&e= was cherry-picked

...

...

...

...

> Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4 > > Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades.

I hereby approve the RGW run. Thanks and sorry for the last minute fix.

Is the broken rgw_s3_auth_order https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_68393&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=g0TCbLbCXpdqGmv5FG2ZQXn406ROsJCIzi7r2XT_9P4&e= not relevant enough for the release then? There is a PR open https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61162&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=iGdwR1eo5Tko2r9k5eB3y3YT251wCHI2AiMGzsdMFOM&e=

Also there are some desperate comments about this breaking / hindering multi-site sync ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_69183-23note-2D4&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=Xtf9Ig7h_WDIj7F6C-UIiHhd8Vj_xprX38C3DHVAl0M&e= ) which I totally agree with.

Regards

Christian

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ceph.io&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=e_CVR7WGo4-QP_VswyglgXv4hiKXEJkoP_N_rOYijYg&e=

...

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above:

Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z

Assuming you meant - that no additional PRs are to be included in 19.2.1 Dan FYI we are back at the LRC upgrade step On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:36 AM Neha Ojha <nojha@redhat.com> wrote:

This ceph-volume PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60487 that merged last week had a dependency on this BlueStore PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60543 (particularly https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60487/files#diff-29697ff230f01df036802c8b2...). Merging the ceph-volume PR into squid without the BlueStore change broke the Rook CI for squid. 19.2.1 (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/squid-release/) does not include PR#60487, therefore, 19.2.1 remains unaffected. 19.2.2 will include both the PRs.

@Yuri Weinstein 19.2.1 is unblocked!

Thanks to Travis, Adam and Guillaume for helping me come to this conclusion.

Cheers, Neha

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:44 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Although, I am not clear the difference between the squid branch since we started seeing this issue last week, and the 19.2.1 branch, so Guillaume or RADOS team should confirm for sure.

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:38 PM Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> wrote:

...

I confirmed that the Rook CI is now passing with the latest squid devel image that was pushed a couple hours ago, including this fix. It is a blocker for properly starting OSDs, at least for Rook. Guillaume was also able to repro the related issue outside Rook. So yes, please it needs to be included in 19.2.1.

Thanks, Travis

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 1:29 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:

...

Does this have to be cherry-picked to 19.2.1?

What tests are to be rerun if yes?

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:21 AM Guillaume ABRIOUX <gabrioux@ibm.com> wrote:

...

Hello,

The rook ci must be failing because a `ceph-bluestore-tool` backport

[1] is missing.

...

This backport was merged ~6 hours ago.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/60543

Regards,

-- Guillaume Abrioux Software Engineer ________________________________ De : Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com> Envoyé : mercredi 15 janvier 2025 20:32 À : Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com> Cc : Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>; dev <dev@ceph.io>; ceph-users <ceph-users@ceph.io> Objet : [EXTERNAL] [ceph-users] Re: squid 19.2.1 RC QE validation status

When running the Rook CI against the latest squid devel image, we are seeing issues creating OSDs, investigating with Guillaume...

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_rook_rook_issues_15282&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=3yKlL-fIl7-Q0HRnATPF5lC3gF6Fnz7Va_JNJMoK22g&e=

...

Travis

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:57 AM Laura Flores <lflores@redhat.com>

wrote:

...

...

The Gibba cluster has been upgraded.

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:27 AM Christian Rohmann < christian.rohmann@inovex.de> wrote:

> Hey Adam, > > On 11.01.25 12:52 AM, Adam Emerson wrote: > > On 10/01/2025, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > >> This PR

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61306&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=AFPJEqe9WdKCH6e1-lQu7E9IQSmRerXeDEKed9RCL_4&e= was cherry-picked

...

...

> >> Adam, pls see the run for the Build 4 > >> > >> Laura, Adam approves rgw, we are ready for gibba and LRC/sepia upgrades. > > > > I hereby approve the RGW run. Thanks and sorry for the last minute fix. > > > Is the broken rgw_s3_auth_order https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_68393&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=g0TCbLbCXpdqGmv5FG2ZQXn406ROsJCIzi7r2XT_9P4&e= > not relevant enough for the release then? > There is a PR open https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ceph_ceph_pull_61162&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=iGdwR1eo5Tko2r9k5eB3y3YT251wCHI2AiMGzsdMFOM&e= > > Also there are some desperate comments about this breaking / hindering > multi-site sync ( https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tracker.ceph.com_issues_69183-23note-2D4&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=Xtf9Ig7h_WDIj7F6C-UIiHhd8Vj_xprX38C3DHVAl0M&e= ) > which I totally agree with. > > > > Regards > > > Christian > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io >

--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__ceph.io&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=C4Heawwemsb-V70dqf3IAEkIXkptzf45zNk5eDDqzFQ&m=aJ-H045Z8CAoePgK7a9DrtfUE-AcAMsVn59AhzFq_wyqe4vDarnmctb5hosU5pkJ&s=e_CVR7WGo4-QP_VswyglgXv4hiKXEJkoP_N_rOYijYg&e=

...

Chicago, IL

lflores@ibm.com | lflores@redhat.com <lflores@redhat.com> M: +17087388804 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io Unless otherwise stated above:

Compagnie IBM France Siège Social : 17, avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex RCS Nanterre 552 118 465 Forme Sociale : S.A.S. Capital Social : 664 614 175,50 € SIRET : 552 118 465 03644 - Code NAF 6203Z

---

ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@ceph.io